<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What The Fig, Levi?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2009/11/17/what-the-fig-levi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2009/11/17/what-the-fig-levi/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:01:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ooh La La! Levi Johnston&#8217;s Playgirl Pics Are Here! &#171; Hollywood Life</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2009/11/17/what-the-fig-levi/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Ooh La La! Levi Johnston&#8217;s Playgirl Pics Are Here! &#171; Hollywood Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodlife.com/?p=9261#comment-349</guid>
		<description>[...] infamous Playgirl shoot have been released, and they&#8217;re actually pretty tame! Even after the announcement that Levi wasn&#8217;t going to bare it all, we still expected steamier shots from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] infamous Playgirl shoot have been released, and they&#8217;re actually pretty tame! Even after the announcement that Levi wasn&#8217;t going to bare it all, we still expected steamier shots from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sim</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2009/11/17/what-the-fig-levi/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>sim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodlife.com/?p=9261#comment-138</guid>
		<description>put the original pic(leaves or may b just a leaf) on people. will like to c that instead of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>put the original pic(leaves or may b just a leaf) on people. will like to c that instead of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: priya</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2009/11/17/what-the-fig-levi/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>priya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodlife.com/?p=9261#comment-103</guid>
		<description>laaaame. weenis fail, levi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>laaaame. weenis fail, levi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ma28</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2009/11/17/what-the-fig-levi/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>ma28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodlife.com/?p=9261#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Oh for Heaven&#039;s sake - I&#039;m not sure who is playing this worse, Levi for flaunting this &quot;Ohh I&#039;m getting naked&quot; ploy as an effort to get in the news, or Palin for using it as a self-righteous excuse to rant about the evils of porn. They&#039;re both hypocritical media whores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh for Heaven&#8217;s sake &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure who is playing this worse, Levi for flaunting this &#8220;Ohh I&#8217;m getting naked&#8221; ploy as an effort to get in the news, or Palin for using it as a self-righteous excuse to rant about the evils of porn. They&#8217;re both hypocritical media whores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)

Served from: 10.3.101.3 @ 2010-03-17 16:11:06 -->