Which Nude GQ Cover Do You Like More — Rihanna or Jen Aniston?
RiRi and Jen had something to prove to the men in their past.
Sorry Chris Brown, John Mayer and Brad Pitt, your exs bared all in more ways than one in GQ. We bet you’re eating your hearts out now! Now, BFFs, two questions #1: Would YOU strip to make your ex sick, and, #2: Are nude covers liberating or degrading? Vote now!
Read More on Rihanna:
Related stories on HollywoodLife.com
Leave a Reply
View Comment
Woot
Posted at 12:45 PM on March 28, 2011
If we did not know how old these women were we wouldn’t even know they had that much of an age gap. Jennifer Aniston has one of the best bodies I have ever seen. Rihanna looks great too but Jennifer has sexier curves!
Martinibee
Posted at 12:35 AM on March 27, 2011
Rhianna but not 20 years better ! more like 20 months ..but the party life and a few more beatings like the one she took from CB will lessen that gap considerably.
obgyn
Posted at 12:32 AM on December 16, 2009
Rihanna looks better because she is younger.
Jen looks great for her age. No matter how slim or toned a woman is, her age still shows in the skin.
There is a tenderness that comes with youth, unless that young person have lived a hard drinking, drugging, street existence.
Rihanna looks a tender 20, Jen looks like a well kept 40.
Age doesn't matter
Posted at 12:27 PM on March 25, 2011
Jen all the way! Age shouldn’t matter and to think that women after their 30 aren’t considered sexy anymore is just stupid. tender? well kept? who the hell say that?
