Sandra’s Shocking Favorite Moment With New Baby Louis — You’ll Never Believe What It Is!
As strange it may sound, her favorite expeirence was baby Louis Bardo Bullock’s secret bris, a Jewish circumcision ceremony.
Though Sandra Bullock and her family had to be super secretive about the adoption of baby Louis Bardo Bullock, they did manage to share one special experience together — a private circumcision! “You have never seen adults more panicked about what was about to happen to their son, but the celebration and the amount of love we felt and the pride in the little man whom we love so, so much became the greatest moment I have ever had in my life,” she tells People. Wow… we never thought we’d get all misty-eyed over a circumcision, but Sandra just makes it sound so beautiful.
Of course, there is one curious thing Sandra says about her son’s procedure. It wasn’t just a standard doctor-performed circumcision — it was a full-on Jewish bris!
“A friend of ours helped arrange for a bris at the house, because we couldn’t go [to a hospital for the procedure]” Sandra tells People. “The mohel [a person trained in the practice] came to us.”
It is surprising that Sandra opted to have a bris, considering neither she nor her soon-to-be-ex-husband Jesse James are Jewish (not to mention Jesse’s apparent interest in Nazis, as captured in photographs.) The only Jewish person connected to Jesse, that we know of, is his godfather, who Jesse says gave him the Nazi hat he was photographed wearing.
Pamela Anderson strips down to lingerie! (E! Online)
CHECK THIS OUT! On the set of ‘Iron Man 2!’ (Moviefone)
Check out what Lindsay Lohan did to a tollbooth! (Wonderwall)
Follow HollywoodLife.com on 
| Become a 
fan
XX
Related stories on HollywoodLife.com
Ryan Reynolds, You Should Take Over Daddy Duty Of Sandra …
read more >>Sandra Bullock Plans To Adopt A Baby Girl! Louis Is Getting A Little …
read more >>Sandra & Jesse Are Selling Their Beachside California Home! …
read more >>It’s Out With Old & In With The New For Sandra Bullock! …
read more >>
Leave a Reply
View Comment
Ian Cooper
Posted at 12:35 PM on July 19, 2011
It’s disgusting. We’ve known for over 60 years that circumcision is severely harmful. One would think that someone in the public eye would have the knowledge and the common decency NOT to abuse and mutilate her son.
Linda
Posted at 3:14 PM on June 3, 2011
Sandra did what most mothers of boys do, that is to have them circumcised. I had my son circumcised when he was born. I think boys are better off that way, cleaner and less problems.
Katy
Posted at 8:52 PM on November 10, 2011
Rachel, please don’t take this the wrong way, because I know you made the choice you thought was best for your son, but circumcision is not “cleaner and less problems.” I promise.
Doctors in America don’t know anything about the foreskin except how to remove it. We are sadly misinformed on the normal development of the natural penis. There is nothing dirty or problematic about the foreskin.
A helpful rhyme to remember proper care of an intact infant is “if intact, don’t retract – only clean what is seen.” In the U.S., we’re told we have to pull the baby’s foreskin back to clean it. This is not true. The foreskin is fused to the head of the penis, so pulling it back is like pulling off a fingernail – painful, and opens them up to infection and scarring. If you use the “leave it alone” approach and only ever clean the outside (don’t pull the foreskin back!), you will have a normal, happy boy who didn’t have to suffer through an unnecessary surgery.
Boys who are circumcised obviously still (usually) grow up to be happy and healthy, but there is a growing movement toward foreskin restoration for men who were cut as boys and wish they hadn’t been. I firmly believe it’s best to leave our sons their natural bodies, since circumcision is irreversible.
I hope you’ll look into this! Thanks for listening!
Rachel
Posted at 5:14 PM on March 15, 2011
When I read this I had to do a double take. I always thought Sandra Bullock had more sense than to mutilate a child. However, after reading that she’s a twisted baby cutter I refuse to support her films and other projects.
By the way, what is with her celebrating a Brit Milah when she isn’t even Jewish? It not only undermines the inhumane nature of circumcision, but is flat out disrespectful to the religious community. She doesn’t have any intentions of becoming Jewish, so why maim a child into keeping the whole law of Moses? On that note, why should any child be maimed as their’ parents religious persuasion?
I honestly don’t know how idiots like this are permitted to adopt. She should be stripped of her adoptive rights and sued by the state for endangering the life of an infant!
Cyn
Posted at 12:15 PM on March 15, 2011
Yeah, when I read this last year, I was so disgusted. I wonder how she’d like it if she was held down while HER genitalia was flayed for no good reason. Sick.
Brooke
Posted at 2:55 PM on March 13, 2011
This is aweful! Just aweful. Sick, in fact.
Carla
Posted at 11:20 PM on March 12, 2011
Well, usually when primitive civilizations perform barbaric ceremonies, they do something to effect some kind of emotional high for the participants so that they don’t focus on the horror of what’s about to happen. In this case, a celebratory ritual atmosphere distracting from the mutilation of an infant’s genitals.
Katie P.
Posted at 8:39 PM on March 12, 2011
Not one health organization in the world recommends circumcision. There are absolutely no health benefits to it. It is painful, unnecessary, and risky…not to mention in direct violation of that little boy’s human rights. Sandra Bullock is a big name actress, and what is sad here is that people follow celebs as though they are the example of how to do things. She is promoting the mutilation of little boys who deserve the same respect and protection we give our girls. EVERY little boy is born with a foreskin, it is not a birth defect and does not need to be corrected. It serves a purpose…to protect the glans of the penis, which is a mucus membrane. I haven’t been this disappointed in someone in a long time. She owes her son, her fans, and THEIR sons, an apology. It’s bad enough to disfigure your own son, but then to promote it, and call it her “favorite moment”?! She’s snuggled him and held him…and cutting off a body part was her favorite moment. What’s wrong with her?!
Not only will I never watch another movie she’s in, I’ll never purchase People magazine again. Of all the stories to write…and to put this on the cover…disgusting.
Lexi
Posted at 6:59 PM on March 12, 2011
That is sick. I will NEVER watch a Sandra Bullock movie again. Never. Mutilating and torturing a baby for NO reason? Not only that, but it’s her favorite moment with him? That is horrible. Would she do that to a daughter?
Lulu
Posted at 6:49 PM on March 12, 2011
I’m so disapponted that Sandra decided to do this to her baby. When will people start to come out of the dark ages and realize that male circumcision is JUST AS WRONG as female circumcision?! Leave the poor babies alone!
Jeanine
Posted at 6:39 PM on March 12, 2011
Watching your son have part of his penis cut off is a “special moment?” Disgusting.
Sheila
Posted at 6:08 PM on March 12, 2011
This would have so much nicer if the story was about her inducing lactation so she could breast-feed her adopted son– not about how she subjected him to removal of a perfectly healthy, functional organ that he might very well want to use one day! Her brownie points just went waaaaay down! :(
AJ
Posted at 5:22 PM on March 12, 2011
:-( I have to echo Lily! This was a completely unnecesary and risky cosmetic procedure! Why not enjoy your new baby as perfect as the day he was born! I Love Sandra Bullock, but this makes me sad!
Lily
Posted at 11:23 PM on March 11, 2011
What a sad story. Bullock is obviously oblivious ti the fact that this procedure is completely unnecessary and harmful.
She chose to rob her son of an important part of his anatomy.
Shelby
Posted at 11:07 PM on March 11, 2011
Your birthing is complete when you give birth, not when you remove a part of your previously perfect son.
