5 CommentsBY 11.26 AM EST 09.07.2010

Good Lord Rihanna! Why Are You Covered In Gun Tattoos?

Rihanna decided to take a dip in the ocean while filming her new movie in Hawaii, but we were shocked to see her covered in new ink! Do you think these are real or just for her film?

Rihanna, 22, we definitely hope this new tattoo is only semi-permanent! We spotted you on the beautiful beaches of Hawaii Sept. 6, where you’re filming your new flick Battleship. You looked absolutely amazing in your itty-bitty bikini, but we just hope the gigantic new tattoo of a gun on your right thigh is completely fake!

We already know you have a tattoo of a gun on your rib cage, but it’s super tiny! Rihanna, why would you get tattoos of guns? We expected you to be completely against this sort of body-marking, especially since you’re a victim of domestic violence!

HollywoodLifers, do you think Rihanna is setting a bad example by getting these types of tattoos?

Related stories on HollywoodLife.com

  • Rihanna Spills On Getting In Shape & Embracing Her Curves In ‘Vogue’!

    Rihanna Spills On Getting In Shape & Embracing Her Curves In …
    read more >>

  • EXCLUSIVE! Rihanna Was A Rude Girl In Cadet School — Her Drill Sergeant Tells All!

    EXCLUSIVE! Rihanna Was A Rude Girl In Cadet School — Her Drill …
    read more >>

  • Rihanna Gets Down In Her Wackiest Outfit Yet On The Set Of Her New Video, ‘What’s My Name!’

    Rihanna Gets Down In Her Wackiest Outfit Yet On The Set Of Her New …
    read more >>

  • FIRST LOOK! Rihanna Makes Jumpsuits Sexy On The Set Of ‘Battleship!’

    FIRST LOOK! Rihanna Makes Jumpsuits Sexy On The Set Of …
    read more >>

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

View Comment

genessys

Posted at 12:58 PM on October 3, 2010  

ewwwwww that looks horrible, females with tatoes on arms looks ugly. i hope is fake too couse i dont look attractive at all.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Babe

Posted at 1:53 PM on September 7, 2010  

Just to clarify: she is no longer a domestic violence VICTIM, she is a SURVIVOR.

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

    Marie

    Posted at 4:29 PM on September 7, 2010  

    Amen. I also agree the tats are probably for her movie and even if they’re not she’s only 22, not married, no kids, beautiful, talented and wealthy…if not now then when? If I could I’d come back as a female George Clooney and enjoy life with no apology.

    Share this comment at Share with Twitter

Nicola

Posted at 11:44 AM on September 7, 2010  

Good Lord, they’re for her film. She has them on her arms too. Who does research for this site?

Share this comment at Share with Twitter

    Judah

    Posted at 1:09 PM on September 7, 2010  

    That’s what I’m saying! For being ‘new tattoos’ they don’t even look freshly done and even if they were, she couldnt really frolic in the sun like that until they are healed. And honestly who is gonna go ob a tattooing spree like that?

    Share this comment at Share with Twitter