His ex-mistress, Rachel Uchitel was offered the big bucks to appear in the nudie mag, but Mr. Woods threatened her into rejecting Hef’s offer.
Tiger Woods doesn’t want you lookin’ at his ladies, even if he’s not dating them anymore! Rachel Uchitel, Tiger’s former head mistress, was given the lucrative opportunity to appear naked in Hugh Hefner’s Playboy, but Tiger SHUT IT DOWN! The disgraced golfer reportedly told Rachel that if she posed in the mag, he would take away the $10 million settlement he gave her months ago.
“It put Rachel in significant danger of losing the millions of dollars Tiger paid her,” a source revealed to RadarOnline.com. “The magazine wanted to mention Rachel’s relationship with Tiger, but it would have jeopardized the deal she already made with him.”
The spread would have included pictures of Rachel posing with a baby tiger (get it?), and she would have made a whopping $300,000! But even though Rachel tried “everything” to make it happen, we won’t be seeing this VIP hostess baring it all.
View Comment
Carmen
Posted at 9:31 PM on September 17, 2010
Rachel Uglitel is a nobody that wanna be rich and important!!! She reportedly wants to remain in the media for spite and revenge towards her lovers, because she has not been able to get what she wanted, to trap a rich man!!! It has been also reported that she is a filthy prostitute and an extortionist of rich married men, who allows men to use her ugly silicone enhanced body for kinky, pervert sex and when they leave her, she threatens to go public and extorts money from them to keep silent about their affair!!!
MeLu
Posted at 9:07 AM on September 17, 2010
If she already has the money in her bank account then he CAN’T take it away from her unless there is something in her contract with him. If she hasn’t paid and there is nothing in the legal contract that prevents her from doing stuff like that then she’ll have a legal right to take him to court for breach of contract. Either way, Tiger Woods has no say in what she does with her body. Now if she spoke to the media after signing a non-disclosure then that’s different but posing naked is not the same thing and he has zero rights. Basically I think this is something coming from her media camp to garner more attention to herself. Isn’t her 15 minutes of “fame” over yet?
Cayenne
Posted at 11:57 AM on September 24, 2010
apparently he does or she would have posed..Probably a contractual clause..get a clue
msfaye
Posted at 10:21 PM on September 16, 2010
when she threatened to show the world his text, we have forgotten that and she was patting herself on the back to get money out of him (tiger) and laughed about ruining his marriage so he could be with her or so the papers said. she has found out that money made this way is the worst kind he will haunt her for the rest of her days. she may have underestimated how vindictive he is but losing his kids and wife and image because of her you know he will be on her like white on rice and it serves the ho right.
Carmen
Posted at 6:47 PM on September 16, 2010
What more is there to see!!! All sort of photos of this WHORE’s lipo and silicone enhanced body are already posted on the web free of charge!!!
Susan
Posted at 11:34 PM on September 16, 2010
Rachel Uchitel is not all that smart if she thinks she is popular. The only one who thinks she is lovely is herself.
or many those two dogs of hers. (The four legged kind)