In a huge departure from the buttoned up control freak she plays on the hit show, Lea shows some major skin in the new issue of ‘GQ!’
Cory Monteith, Dianna Agron and Lea Michele cover the November issue of GQ, but it is Lea who is grabbing all the attention! Gone are the cardigans and sensible skirts the young actress is normally attired in on the hit show Glee, replaced with a pair of skimpy underwear, a revealing top, tube socks and one very lucky lollipop.
Check out the photos in the gallery above!

View Comment
gluten free diet
Posted at 2:17 PM on May 24, 2012
Thank you for the good writeup. It in reality was a enjoyment account it. Glance complicated to more added agreeable from you! However, how can we keep up a correspondence?
vps trial
Posted at 1:23 AM on May 23, 2012
That is really attention-grabbing, You are an overly professional blogger. I have joined your rss feed and look ahead to looking for more of your wonderful post. Additionally, I have shared your website in my social networks
Glenn
Posted at 8:57 AM on October 20, 2010
What fun! Great for the ‘kids’ to play with hot stereotypes. And it’s not like they’re anywhere near being teenagers, so those who object should first look up their real ages…
Way to go, GQ!
Jennifer
Posted at 7:40 AM on October 20, 2010
Ew, Lea is just too skinny and trying way to hard to look sexy. Dianna looks gorgeous and doesn’t come off slutty in the pictures.
Stone
Posted at 9:07 PM on October 19, 2010
HOT!.
gleekfan
Posted at 4:22 PM on October 19, 2010
okay, is this REALLY necessary?? I honestly think it is pretty tacky
gleek
Posted at 4:13 PM on October 19, 2010
she looks hot, i don’t know people always talk that she lost weight, she is fine.
anto32
Posted at 4:04 PM on October 19, 2010
Lea is really sexy there,much more than Diana.
anna
Posted at 3:03 PM on October 19, 2010
why cory isn’t shirtless too?:(
raphael
Posted at 1:20 PM on October 19, 2010
fine girl, she has a great body.
Ashley
Posted at 3:59 PM on October 20, 2010
^ Yeah – The only positive comment. Probably from a creepy old man.
Way to go GQ, way to go. So disgusting.
The point may be that she is old enough and in ordinary circumstances this wouldn’t even be news — but the fact is still that she portrays a high school girl on a TV show with generally younger-skewed audiences. Definitely NOT of age.
And when they see her dressed like a skank in school, if they like her character it’s encouraging in real life.
The only ones who think it’s “ok” are those who don’t have daughters or a brain. I don’t have any children at all and I still get where these parents are coming from.
Linz
Posted at 7:49 PM on October 20, 2010
I totally agree! I think lea and dianna are gorgeous, but I also respect them as actresses that don’t take thier clothes off without good reason. For instance, Lea’s character in spring awakening showed a little skin, b/c of the nature of the scene she was in. At the same time, she didn’t come off as trashy in this scene, it was very tasteful. She’s done other photoshoots that were in little clothing, but were tasteful. I think that the difference lies in how this was shot. This is the fault of the photographer. Are the pictures nice: yes. Do they have the bodies to pull of these shots: yes. Was this an appropriate context to put these actresses in: absolutely not. They don’t need the bad publicity that comes with basically soft core porn shots like this. They are sooo far above that as far as class!! Intimate, artistic photoshots are one thing and cheap looking crotch shots are another. GQ, you need to pick up a little class.