Is Sarah Palin Really Trig’s Grandmother?
A shocking internet rumor is now backed up by new evidence from an academic study — do YOU believe it?
Sarah Palin is a controversial figure in American politics, but a new report reveals she may have pulled off one of the craziest stunts ever: claiming two-year-old Trig was her son when he was really born to Sarah’s daughter Bristol! The reason? To ensure her pregnant teenage daughter would be out of the spotlight while Sarah was running for vice-president!
A new academic article, written by Professor Bradford Scharlott of Northern Kentucky University, theorizes the above to be true and the coverup to be a result of press negligence — and he has a staggering amount of evidence to support the claim. Besides being photographed without a baby bump just weeks before Trig was born, staff members were flabbergasted when Sarah announced she was seven months pregnant, given that she showed virtually no physical signs — especially compared to her previous pregnancies. The report also documents many odd behaviors Sarah exhibited around the time of birth. Most strange was the fact that after she went into labor on April 17, 2008, she allegedly traveled for 20 hours to fly back home to Alaska to give birth.
Furthermore, documents prove there was no hospital location given by Sarah when she announced the birth, and the hospital Trig was allegedly born at doesn’t have pre-natal intensive care — an essential step for babies with Down syndrome — and he was never announced on the hospital’s birth roster. Furthermore, the doctors there for the delivery have declined any questions, and the subsequent release of Palin’s medical records point to no specifics surrounding the birth of Trig.
Read the fascinating report above and let us know what you think, HollywoodLifers. And let’s see the birth certificate, Sarah, to settle this once and for all!
– William Earl
More Sarah Palin!
Related stories on HollywoodLife.com
Bristol Palin WANTED To Get Pregnant, Because She Was Mad At Her Mom …
read more >>
Bristol Palin’s Heckler Issues An Apology! Now We Think …
read more >>
Bristol Palin Says Her Bar Rant Wasn’t Homophobic — …
read more >>
Bristol Palin’s Homophobic Behavior Perpetuates An Illness …
read more >>
Leave a Reply
View Comment
Dis Gusted
Posted at 7:58 PM on October 26, 2011
look close and you can see the square bandage from her lipo-dissolve. TriG was allegedly born less than one month later. Considering Sarah had a tubal ligation with cauterization immediately after the birth of Piper, one can only wonder who gave birth to Trigger.
The birth dates of both boys have never been confirmed because SP is crazy. She could have an easy $10K to donate to charity if she would just show the birth certificate. Too bad that birth certificate would prove TriG’s real birth date and his real parents.
bkisses
Posted at 6:20 AM on October 13, 2011
who gives a crap.. why not just show the birth certificate and dna whos the real mother.. im so sick of all this ..
Armentta
Posted at 6:36 PM on March 11, 2012
She ran on a conservative ticket of honesty, transparency, and Pro-life, therefore, every American should care. She placed herself in the position to influence laws and millions of lives, so we do care a SH– . After showing an original birth certificate, she is still is saying the President is not an American. She needs to show Trig’s birth certificate and come clean with the American people. All she has done for money is spread hate and lies about. However, the truth will come to light.
dee
Posted at 12:33 PM on April 23, 2011
It’s obvious that the picture on the right, is taken at a different time. Why are we to trust a ‘source’ claiming that it was taken when she was 8 mth pregnant. If the picture had a date on it, or something in the background, then maybe. But either way, this claim is just stupid. Why would she deny Trigg as Bristol’s,…Bristol already got pregnant as a teen, so it’s not like it helps anyone.
Waverly
Posted at 3:40 AM on April 18, 2011
I question the date of the picture on the right. If anything I would think that picture was taken after Trig’s birth. Weren’t those glasses Sarah Palin is wearing part of her makeover for the McCain campaign?
Susan
Posted at 12:09 AM on April 17, 2011
I think you are all forgetting that if Bristol bore Trig than she could not have been pregnant with her son Tripp. Their gestational periods overlap, so Bristol is definitely not the biological mother of Trig.
Elle
Posted at 9:14 PM on April 16, 2011
Just so you people know, the Palins knew that the baby was going to have Down Syndrome before he was born. Tests during pregnancy can cause a miscarriage so the only way they will do them is if the mother is at a high risk age, i.e. 35+. It couldn’t have been Bristol, OR WILLOW’S baby.
This statement is not true. An amniocentesis or a CVS is different than a regular triple screen. I have been pregnant twice and had the triple screen offered both times. Amnio is what they do after the triple has certain markers for DS or other genetic problems. The triple screen is no different than having blood drawn for gestational diabetes or any other routine blood work.
OldVegasGuy
Posted at 6:45 PM on April 16, 2011
Sarah is the Devil’s Grandfather!
Alana
Posted at 4:16 PM on April 16, 2011
Just b/c she’s not really showing doesn’t mean anything. I was huge when I was pregnant with my first child. Not that big with my second, and now with my third, I’m showing but nothing at all like I did with my first born.
Duh
Posted at 1:13 AM on April 16, 2011
Just so you people know, the Palins knew that the baby was going to have Down Syndrome before he was born. Tests during pregnancy can cause a miscarriage so the only way they will do them is if the mother is at a high risk age, i.e. 35+. It couldn’t have been Bristol, OR WILLOW’S baby.
divajones
Posted at 11:22 AM on April 17, 2011
That is not true they conduct down syndrome testing for all women regardless of the age or risk factor. While it is true that there are increased risk with older women the same is true for women under the age of 18 which bristol was. I am also pregnant with my second child and i am not showing as much but that picture of sarah palin shows she could not be 8 or 9 months pregnant that was taken a few weeks before she gave birth
Jan
Posted at 1:13 AM on April 16, 2011
Liberals should focus on Donald Trump who has BILLIONS$$ to spend if he chooses to run and he is not happy with Obama right now. Try attacking his children and he will attack back.
Jan
Posted at 1:06 AM on April 16, 2011
I am so tired of the “Trig” question. Sarah HAS his birth certificate AND HER doctor’s records. Bristol was in high school and NO baby bump at all. If you want to question birth, have Obama show his REAL birth certificate.
shans
Posted at 12:51 AM on April 16, 2011
Oh, and since we are on the subject of Sarah Palin lying to the nation, how about we discuss why no one has ever confirmed that Barack Obama was born in the US? huh.
Goya
Posted at 10:48 PM on April 16, 2011
Of course “they” have proved President Obama was born in the US. He has documentation from the State of Hawaii as confirmed by the last Governor of Hawaii and posted it on his campaign’s website 2 and 1/2 years ago. The current Governor of Hawaii knew his parents and remembers Baby Obama and the Doctor who delivered him told his family about it because he thought it was funny that “Stanley” had a baby. His surviving daughter remembers it clearly.
FactCheck. org and other organizations have seen the original birth certificate and his birth was announced in two Honolulu newspapers, along with other babies born within a couple of days of each other.
Barack Obama is also a US citizen no matter where he was born by virtue of the fact that his Mother was a citizen at the time of his birth — or are you saying Stanley Ann Dunham wasn’t born in Kansas?
Anna
Posted at 1:35 PM on April 15, 2011
Yup, the details are not clear and the story in general is fishy, but why do we care so much? I understand that most people don’t agree with her politics, but we SHOULD be focusing on Sarah Palin the politician, not Sarah Palin the mother.
impatientmiss
Posted at 6:25 PM on April 15, 2011
Seriously? Please lets hope she doesnt run because idiots will vote for her and there are alot of them.
Anna
Posted at 7:58 PM on April 15, 2011
Yeah I understand that. I agree, let’s hope she doesn’t run. But all I’m trying to say is that in my opinion, it’s stupid to be obsessed with her personal life like this. Why do we care whose child this is? Is he her son? Is he her grandson? We don’t know, and we shouldn’t care. I’m saying we should not focus on her family and whether or not she may have lied about her pregnancy. We should focus on her politics (good or bad), since that’s why she’s in the public eye to begin with.
shans
Posted at 12:52 AM on April 16, 2011
At least Us “idiots” that voted for Sarah Palin werent the ones that voted for our awesome President. Regardless of her personal life, she would have made a much better President/Vice President.
Goya
Posted at 10:57 PM on April 16, 2011
You can’t be serious!!
Palin would have run our economy into a black hole and we would have 20+% unemployement with porple living on the street. She would have e\scalagted the war in Iraq and Afgahnistan and tried to invade Iran.
The she would have given as many federal resources as she could to her backers like T. Boone Pickens, BP, the Koch Brothers, William Kristol, Rupert Murdoch, Greta van Sustern and her COS husband, Sean Hannity, Dick Armey etc.
jessica
Posted at 12:59 PM on April 15, 2011
I wouldn’t be surprised if the baby is her daughter Willows.
MooCow
Posted at 11:38 AM on April 15, 2011
Not showing at 6 mos., with your 5th baby at that age is unheard of.
And she didn’t “allegedly” fly from Texas to Alaska after her WATER BROKE (reportedly). She absolutely did so on a chartered private jet. But instead of going to the nearest hospital upon landing she allegedly traveled by car, not an ambulance, to the hospital in Wasilla.
Jan
Posted at 1:10 AM on April 16, 2011
Her water was LEAKING, not totally broken. Both her teen daughters were in high school during Trigg’s time in Sarah’s womb and both were playing SPORTS and that was no baby bumps. Bristol was playing football. Bristol become pregnant later.
josette
Posted at 11:05 AM on April 15, 2011
She always looks
& acts fake…Hope she doesn’t run for Vice President or President..She won’t get my vote..Didn’t the first time either.
Gar
Posted at 9:14 PM on April 14, 2011
What matters is whether or not Sarah Palin lied about her pregnancy, not who people think Trig’s “real” mother is. Forget about people thinking it’s Bristol’s baby and look at the pictures of Sarah, and read her story about Trig’s birth.
just me
Posted at 8:22 PM on April 14, 2011
Bristol Palin was absent from school for the last 4-5 months of her “mother’s pregnancy”. Sarah Palin’s water alledgedly broke while at a conference in Texas. She then gave a 30 minute speech and boarded a plane for an 11 hour trip back to Alaska. They don’t let you on a plane if you are more than 7 months pregnant, let alone in labor. The hospital she alledgely gave birth in has no record of Trig being born on April 18 and there is no birth certificate.
Sarah
Posted at 8:15 PM on April 14, 2011
Reports never have sait it was Bristols in the past, its her other daughter’s.
Ginger
Posted at 5:53 PM on April 14, 2011
Does Sarah Palin have another daughter that had the baby? Was the baby a preemie?
Danielle
Posted at 5:35 PM on April 14, 2011
Trigg IS her son, Tripp is her grandson… there less than a year apart theres no way she could have given birth to both…
Min
Posted at 4:15 PM on April 14, 2011
i dont think i quite get it…….are yall trying to say that bristol is the mom of both babies?? wth?
Rationalist
Posted at 12:24 AM on April 15, 2011
It’s not clear who the birth mother of Trig. But it’s not Sarah Palin.
nene
Posted at 4:09 PM on April 14, 2011
Wow, Sarah is a liar.
MeLu
Posted at 3:58 PM on April 14, 2011
Trig was born April 18, 2008, Tripp was born December 27, 2008. That’s less than eight months apart. Impossible for Trig to be Bristol’s son.
just me
Posted at 4:11 PM on April 14, 2011
It is not easy, but it would be possible. I know someone who had their first child in April and foolishly believed that she couldn’t get pregnant again right away. She gave birth to her second child in December. So yes, it is possible.
steff17
Posted at 4:53 PM on April 14, 2011
OMG! Bristol was already pregnant when Trig was born on April 18th. Trig was not due till end of may, he was a preemie.
Trigg was born Dec 29th which means Bristol got pregnant near end of march.
Do the math!!!!!
C’mon Bonnie,you can do better than this crap!!
steff17
Posted at 4:56 PM on April 14, 2011
Correction: Tripp was born Dec, 29th
carrier234
Posted at 8:13 PM on April 14, 2011
Trig was a “premie” who went home from the hospital with a hole in his heart the next day?!?! Sarah took him to work with her 3 days later!! Something tells me that Trig was not a born on the day she claims.
Dusty
Posted at 8:20 PM on April 14, 2011
Trig was ‘presented’ 4/18/2008 His actual DOB is either Jan or Feb 2008. So yes, Bristol can be Trigg’s mom. Google Babygate then start reading. You’ll be amazed at the information out there.
Older_Wiser
Posted at 9:02 PM on April 14, 2011
That’s only if you believe Twitler’s fantastic story that he was actually born on 4/18 and that he wasn’t born much earlier.
Rationalist
Posted at 12:23 AM on April 15, 2011
There has been no independent confirmation of either birth, so no, we don’t know for sure when either baby was born.
Ennealogic
Posted at 11:21 AM on April 15, 2011
We have no evidence that either of those dates is true.
What you could say is, “IF Trig was born April 18, 2008, AND IF Tripp was born December 27, 2008, it would be extremely unlikely that Bristol is Trig’s birth mother.”
But that totally misses the point!!! What the point is, is that there is NO evidence whatsoever that Sarah Palin birthed Trig. That’s it. No need to bring Bristol into it, or anyone else. This is about Sarah, and the likelihood that she faked a pregnancy.
jason
Posted at 3:24 PM on April 14, 2011
Wacko Christian crazies will never resort to something so obtuse as fact when making a decision. They don’t have to. Preachers and Fox News tells them how to think.
